Of all the tricks and traps in the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA), one of the nastiest is the burden-shifting that has gone on with respect to the automatic stay. Once upon a time creditors had to come to Court to put a debtor out of house and home — now the burden is on the debtor in certain cases to say why they shouldn’t, and to do it so that other creditors become aware of it! A pair of cases from Florida and Tennessee say it all.

In re Covert, 355 B.R. 327 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Fla. 2006). (Lewis M. Killian, Jr., Judge).
Debtor’s counsel filed a motion to extend the automatic stay on the 30th day after filing the petition and the Court denied it, noting that