Case Roundup Cir. 10

bankruptcy-court-seal.jpg

10th cir

Mosier v. Callister, Nebeker & McCullough, No. 07-4238 [Nov 13, 2008]

Suit was brought by trustee on behalf of estate against law firm and its attorneys alleging professional negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, vicarious liability, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, and civil conspiracy. The U.S. District court entered summary judgment for defendants. The Appellate court affirmed saying District Court did not err by imputing the conduct of selected officers to the defendant (a not-for-profit corp); correctly applied the doctrine of in pari delicto to hold that fault of the corporation was greater than that of its attorneys; and there was no error in applying the doctrine against a trustee in bankruptcy.

In re: Lanning, No. 08-3009 [Nov 13, 2008]

For purposes of calculating projected disposable income of an above-median Chapter 13 debtor under the BAPCPA, the circuit court adopts the forward-looking approach wherein a Chapter 13 debtor’s six-month, pre-petition “disposable income” (as defined by statute) is presumed to be the debtor’s “projected disposable income” for purposes of establishing the monthly sum that the debtor must commit to repayment of unsecured creditors in order to advance a confirmable payment plan and overcome objections to it. Amount of projected disposable income is rebuttable upon showing of “special circumstances” at the time of plan confirmation.

Advertisements

One response to “Case Roundup Cir. 10

  1. Nice round-up! (And excellent template-pick!) I’d like to do something like this for my own 6th Circuit …