Category Archives: subprime mortgage

Illinois Foreclosure Statistics

Advertisements

Illinois foreclosures down …

Media_httpwwwrealtytr_tfcje

… but still in the national top 10, meaning that 1 in 550 housing units in Illinois is now in foreclosure. That in turn translates to roughly 1 out of every 10 residential homes.

But the real scourge of the real estate market is that is has hollowed out entire blocks and permanently affected the ability of homeowners to move, sell, divorce, or refinance. Most are stuck, and many are stuck paying for more house than they actually have.

Failed Bank List

Logo of the United States Federal Deposit Insu...

Image via Wikipedia

This is the list maintained by the FDIC of bank failures since October 2000. You can download the list as a CSV file as well. Below find a portion of the complete list …

New Report: Default Mortgages and Foreclosures on 7.3 Million Homes

Mortgages in default and foreclosed homes now account for just over 7.3-million homes. The report for April released by Lender Processing Services shows that there is at least some sign of an improvement in the foreclosure crisis with the number of loans 90 days or more delinquent declining from March. However, there are more than 4-million homes in default nationwide and deterioration levels remain excessively high with two loans rolling to a “worse” status for every single loan that has improved. The overall volume of mortgages moving from delinquent to current status declined to a three-month low supported primarily by “artificial cures” associated with the Obama administration’s housing relief program known as HAMP.

Read the full article from Housing Predictor

Miller v. LaSalle Bank (7th Cir.)

Amendment to Indiana recording statute applied to all mortgages, whenever filed. IC 32-21-4- 2(c) amends the Indiana recording act so that mortgages with certain technical defects are still considered to provide constructive notice. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the amended statute applied to all mortgages regardless of when they had filed. The statute’s use of the phrase “is recorded” was ambiguous, the Court of Appeals found. Applying the statute retroactively would not upset vested substantive rights, as debtors did not have vested rights to the effect of technical defects at the time their mortgage was recorded. Importantly, the same legislative session enacted, within ten months, a subsequent amendment clarifying the subject amendment which stated that the subsection “applies regardless of when a mortgage was recorded.”

Posted via email from beyond bankruptcy

ILINDMiddle classch 13ch 7,cir 7creditorcurrent affairs,current-eventsdefault,foreclosureindividuallegislation,modificationmortgageproperty,real propertysecuredstate court

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Disproportionality Even in Bankruptcy

Bankruptcy Claims More Female Victims

An editorial by Rafia Khader, Law Clerk, M. Hedayat & Associates, P.C.

Bankruptcy is a trying situation for any individual. But for women it seems as if the laws yet again disproportionately burden them. I came across an interview with Harvard Law Professor Elizabeth Warren a while ago that was both shocking and predictable. In it she said that changes to the bankruptcy law made in 2005 (oh those again!) made it much harder for women to make ends meet.

Before 2005 women dependent on domestic support from their ex-husbands were able to collect such payments with full confidence because declaring bankruptcy meant that the ex-husband’s debts, excluding domestic support obligations of course, would be wiped out. But no, the credit card companies didn’t like that! Why should ex-wives be able to collect the ex-husband’s money and not they! The injustice!  So in 2005, they had the laws changed. Today, discharge of credit card debt is not necessarily guaranteed and women are, as Warren says,  in ‘direct competition’ for the ex-husband’s resources. Thanks, credit card companies!

But perhaps what is most truly startling are the statistics from theU.S. Women’s Chamber of Commerce. A study found that women were 32% more likely to have received supbrime mortgages than men. And that’s irrespective of income! Women were also 41% more likely have received higher cost subprime loans for their businesses. And we all know what suprime means. Thanks, Wall Street!

Sure, these statistics don’t establish any type of causal relationship and you can’t really blame credit card companies for ruining women’s lives (there are other institutions in places that have contributed to that), but the bottom line is this: women definitely do have it tougher. But of course I am a woman and I would say that.

But I am also right.

RK

No End in Sight for Mortgage Delinquencies